Відео

Thank you for posting this. Interesting questions- interesting answers. (What’s with the antagonism against the host in the comments section?!)

I LOVE Eli!! I wish he were on more news shows to cut through all the BS!

Peter Coyote is one of the most intelligent men I ever heard and let me tell you I've heard some of the sharpest! Peter is almost there with how he describes our universe or to be correct "electric universe" the late Wallace (Wal) Thornhill,; and actually to be scientifically correct our "electrified plasma universe" Wal Thornhill, DR. Anthony Peratt, Dr. C J. Ransom, and James M. Kenyon independent researcher, because that's where we live. Peter is also correct in his evaluation of the universe as far as it has the power to provide us with everything we need but in my opinion is keeping a close eye on us! I do hope Peter reads some of these comments as there are folks who have some good things to say.

❤️ WHEN DEMOCRACY IS LOST IT IS HART TO GET IT BACK !❤️❣️🇨🇦💙💙💙. THANK YOU !

NBC disinfo.

another offspring of obama wokism

What a clown. What about Mossad?

Aspire to be a US Senator, Trae;

There is the big world history. And then there are the every-day settings of times past. It is fascinating to learn how people in the past were different and at the same time similar to us. I like the lively story-telling!!

There were much more killings of innocents to hide the truth behind JFK's Assassination. Lists included Doctors, Cops, Agents of different Agencies, Automobile Mechanics and even innocent housewives who spontaneously went to give the truthful informations and/or witness reporting related to Oswald, Ruby, Marcelo in the killing of JFK and who knew the truth while doing autopsy. And all those killing were conducted by E.H, then FBI chief.

TRUMP 2024!!!!!

Hypothetical physicist. Theories require testing.

The fight for democracy is real and we must not support the traitor Donald Trump who tried to overthrow a fair election(which I've included proof for, see below). Please do not support Trump. 7:30 a.m. January 6th, Jim Jordan text Meadows and tells them that Pence should be prepared to overthrow the election. 9:24 a.m. Trump calls Jordan himself continuing to promote the efforts to pressure Pence to overthrow the will of the people. 9:55 a.m. Secret Service tells Donald Trump that the rally on the ellipse has a lot of people there with weapons guns bow and arrows knives and machetes. 10:15 a.m. Secret Service tells Meadows about the weapons and apparently he has little or no reaction. Trump's reaction was "well they like me they're not after me bring them in.". 10:47 a.m. Julian Eastman give a speech on the ellipse calling for the overthrow of the election. 11:20 a.m. Trump continues to pressure Pence calling him a wimp because he won't refuse to certify the election. 11:50 a.m. Trump tells his staff knowing that the crowd is armed that they need to drop the magnetometers that are protecting him and others at the ellipse. 12:00 p.m. Trump speaks at the ellipse on Jan 6 and attacks Mike Pence publicly once again. 1:00 p.m. over at the Capitol proud boys break the first line of defense and enter the capital. 1:10 p.m. Trump during his speech at the ellipse points to the Capitol and tells supporters to go there and he'll be there with him shortly. 1:19 p.m. Trump goes back to the white house instead but then decides he wants to go to the Capitol, staff around him refused to let him go pissing him off. 1:25 p.m. 78 minutes or so of dereliction of Duty that say that Trump sat in the private dining room watching on television and did nothing about it. 2:00 p.m. Pat Cipollone general counsel for Donald Trump tells Meadows Chief of Staff to tell Trump to stop the riot "do what he needs to do" that's rejected 2:15 p.m. Pat Cipollone makes the request again, that's rejected. 2:24 p.m. Trump slams Pence once again in on his Twitter while the violence is going on and raging all around the Capitol and legislators are running for their lives. 2:26 p.m. Pence is evacuated by secret service for his own security. 2:28 p.m. Marjorie Taylor Greene thinks there's a problem she tells Meadows to tell Trump to calm the people that's rejected. 2:38 p.m. Trump tweets to "stay peaceful". 2:40 p.m. The The Oath Keepers already convicted in two separate trials enter the capital in military formation up the capital steps. 2:44 p.m. Ashley Babbitt is shot as she tries to make her way down the speaker's hallway to get to the Senate chamber 2:45 p.m. rioters enter the senate floor and Nancy Pelosi's office. 2:53 p.m. Trump Jr tells Meadows to tell Trump "you gotta call off the mob" Trump refuses. 3:13 p.m. Trump picks up his Twitter again and tweets "stay peaceful" Again while the Capitol Police are overrun. 3:15 p.m. Ivanka calls Meadows to tell Trump to do something right and she tweets out "stay peaceful". 3:31 p.m. Sean Hannity(Fox News) texts Meadows and says you got to tell Trump to tell them to leave tell the rioters to leave that's rejected by Donald Trump. 4:05 p.m. Don Jr tells Meadows quote "we need an oval address right now". 4:17 p.m. Trump finally releases a video that he made telling them to go home three hours after the breach after he has been given Intel for the last three hours while he sat in the dining room doing nothing. 5:00 p.m. the Lou Dobbs show and Fox News Executives refuse Trump air time on Fox News instead Trump tweets "this is what happens when a sacred Landslide election Victory his own is viciously be ripped away from people".

Nice of Sean to put over this interviewer. He clearly has no knowledge in this topic area and is clearly very nervous.

Derrick Wilson ., looking for revenge, for Judy garland, jack Kennedy and revenge for dorothys death !!! The Oz shooting with magical trajectories on the emerald president from the emerald city called Boston ...

From the transcript: 10:09 So but you say that the fields are the fundamental stuff of the universe, not not the particles. 10:19 Now, I know that's difficult to explain, but because 10:25 our fields, I guess there's this big question, our fields, a mathematical map of of what's going on or is it what's going on? 10:34 Is quantum mechanics a mathematical map of what's going on? It gives great, great answers. 10:40 Or is it or is what really is going on. And what we see is a kind of mistake in a way. 10:46 So anyway. As far as we know, it is what is going on. There are controversies here, as you said when we started talking, because 10:54 physicists and philosophers don't agree on what quantum mechanics is actually saying. 11:00 But we think that reality actually is doing these things that the mathematical models tell us. I have been trying to understand a particular aspect of quantum field theory, and the conversation gets very close to addressing this, but unfortunately there are 2 sources of ambiguity: (1) the discussion seems to morph between being about quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. "Is quantum mechanics a mathematical map of what's going on? . . . Or is it or is what really is going on." (2) Sean "it is what is going on", but then "reality actually is doing these things that the mathematical models tell us" - so Sean's answer morphs from "really going on" to "mathematical model" and we do not have an unambiguous answer to this key question.

Robert Reich is always complaining about Billionaires. Whose sponsoring this? Mark Zuckerberg. Billionaires that help Democrats are the good Billionaires.

It is almost as if China and Russia don't need to promote the advantages of their alternative Eurasian World Order; because the U.S. the U.K. and the EU are doing such a good job of wrecking the existing Liberal World Order.

Impossible to listen to, unfortunately. The host does really a disservice to the guest.

55:03 "Quantum theory is not the same radical theory as RT." (Einstein). P.S. So cleverly arranged: 0.by solving the Schrodinger equation for a free particle, it is possible to obtain a complete state function, which is a plane monochromatic wave and coincides with the de Broglie wave*. 1.This coincidence, of course, is not accidental, since the de Broglie hypothesis was used from the very beginning in the development of quantum mechanics, which received reliable experimental confirmation. 2.But the normalization condition is not fulfilled for the wave function: physically, this is due to the fact that absolutely free particles do not exist in nature, however, mathematically it is easier to apply this function in quantum theory.Why? 3.It should always be remembered that the wave function is a mathematical object and "it" cannot be found even experimentally by direct measurement (arbitrariness in the phase multiplier does not lead to the observed effects, since in this theory it is convenient to talk about the position of a microparticle only in space). 4.Thus, all the successes of quantum theory lie in the manipulation of facts and interpretation: 5.the de Broglie wave "suddenly" coincides with the fundamentally unobservable "?", and gives real answers to experimental questions thanks to de Broglie, 6.and applause to Born or Everett (... and others). Bravo! -------------- *) - The de Broglie hypothesis says nothing about the nature of "waves of matter"; de Broglie waves cannot be considered as waves in some material medium. Their physical meaning has yet to be clarified. And physicists expressed the incomprehensible in an even more vague way: waves of probability or their branching. {However, it seems that de Broglie waves are inertia waves, and the methodical development of this interpretation naturally leads to the identification and understanding of the phenomenon of gravity/inertial induction, and thus the creation of QG.}

The title encapsulates the main idea. I would argue that Russia is a significant player in intelligence sharing, considering the examples set by Japan and South Korea. Can we assume that China also participates in this exchange of information?

We can't address any of this until we win in November. If democracy wins in November. And if we don't, we are in for the kind of system change that could bake in minority rule for decades. And we dont have decades to go through a Franco type authoritarian system of government like Spain. We have a climate emergency with a small window of opportunity to do something meaningful about it. Our kids and grandkids are already in a lot trouble and they are not even born. Now they also have to worry about their civil rights and a potential dictatorship??? Are you freaking kidding us???

One millionth of a second is too fast for us remember or experience, so it’s fair to say that in that short span of time we have no sense of being or our sense of being doesn’t exist. The span of time we can remember or be aware of is joined together by spans of time that are too fast for us to be able to take any notice of, so how is it possible to have a sense of being at all. Let’s imagine an atom moves an extremely short distance. The span of time it takes for this atom to move this extremely short distance is too short of a time interval for us to be aware of anything, so where were we, or where was our sense of being. To us, the universe, a hurricane, or an infinitely long line of dominos that are falling down does not have a sense of being according to us. Say one day feels like one second to us, but one second just feels like one second to the person standing next to us, then according to the person standing next to us our sense of being does not exist. So what if we as conscious beings are both ourselves, as well as the universe. We can be ourselves where one second feels like one second, and at the same time we can be the universe, which solves the problem as not consciously existing at extremely short time spans. At extremely short time spans that are too fast for us to be aware of anything, we can’t say that we are different individuals because we don’t exist. Every one could be the universe. Imagine two zero dimensional points. These two zero dimensional points are like two universes that are infinitely large, but in the opposite way, being infinitely small, not in any particular space, or are not separated by any space but both separated by time. Nonetheless, even though these two zero dimensional points are separated by time, they both still exist simultaneously. Let’s say one second was like one second to one of these zero dimensional points, but one second was like one day to the other one. That would make perfect sense as to why the two points are separated from each other by time but still both exist simultaneously. So everyone could be their individual selves, and at the same time every one could make the universe. All numbers are the same because all a number really is is just the digit one that is a certain way up the number line, but the boundaries in between numbers really are different to the digit ones each side of them. So one of these two zero dimensional points that is experiencing time different from the other could be a boundary in between numbers, and the other could be a digit one. Our sense of being may not be zero dimensional but four dimensional. We need to be focusing on a colour to have a sense of being, even if we are just imagining it, which involves time going by. If one hundred years went on while we had no sense of being, it would be like a flash to us. Let’s say we were each individual zero dimensional points all mixed together to make one single zero dimensional point where one second feels like one second. At the same time, in a span of time that is too short for us to be aware of or exist, we could all make the universe or another zero dimensional point where one week feels like one second. You see, we are saying the universe doesn’t have a sense of being, and in an extremely short span of time we are saying our sense of being doesn’t exist, so in that short span of time we could all make the universe or we could all make another zero dimensional point where one week feels like one second. If one second feels like one second to zero dimensional point A, but one week feels like one second to zero dimensional point B, we would see zero dimensional point A as being us. In a super symmetrical way, what if there were other beings that thought the zero dimensional point B was them. If 20 people were all individual zero dimensional points that were mixed together to form one single zero dimensional point, the 20 would all agree on what number they are looking at because the 20 zero dimensional points would make one single zero dimensional point. But if 5 of the 20 disagreed with what colour the numbers and background were, the distance away the numbers are, and how far they are spread apart, would that 5 of the 20 form a seperate zero dimensional point or individual zero dimensional points, as well as the one they are part of. Imagine if how many, what colour, how far away, how far apart, all mixed to form a sense of how fast time is moving. Then if every one was part of one zero dimensional point where one second feels like one second, then no one could form separate zero dimensional points because they disagreed with what colour the numbers are or how far away or apart they are. If every one was part of zero dimensional point A where one second feels like one second, every one could be part of zero dimensional point B at the same time, where one week feels like one second, because no body’s sense of being exists at extremely short time intervals. To us, a hurricane or the weather doesn’t have a sense of being. Our sense of being can’t be joined together by extremely short time spans that we can’t take any notice of, so everyone can be the one universe at the same time. If there were two things separated by time but both exist simultaneously, where one second feels like one second to one, but one second feels like one hour to the other, that would make sense as to why the two things are separated from each other by time but both still exist simultaneously.

Imagine mixing a handful or infinite amount of pinballs the same size together and you still end up with one pinball the same size. Zero dimensional points are the intersections of two one dimensional lines crossing paths. You can’t see them because they are zero dimensional, but are used for locating areas on a map. Like the pinballs, you could keep mixing an infinite number of zero dimensional points together forever and still end up with one zero dimensional point. Let’s say there is one zero dimensional point composed of twenty individual zero dimensional points mixed together. Imagine an individual zero dimensional point mixing with the one composed of 20, it would be still the same as two individual points mixing together. As this individual point mixes with the point composed of 20, as it mixes in it will make the point composed of 20 half as different as it was, then the individual point will become meaningless, because it is now part of one zero dimensional point that was composed of 20. You can’t say there is a certain number of zero dimensional points mixed with each other because there is no order in one zero dimensional point. This individual zero dimensional point that has mixed in with the zero dimensional point composed of 20 individual zero dimensional points, has made the point composed of 20 points half as different as it was then the individual point has become meaningless because it is part of the 20 individual points to make one single point. Could this be a result of a point being part of two systems. It could be one point that is in its original spot, and at the same time be a point that has come from its original spot. Don’t think about the individual point mixing in making the point of 20 half as different following the individual point becoming meaningless as it is mixed in. Think of it as the individual point becomes meaningless as it is mixed in to the point of 20 after making it half as different, it is as if there has being nothing to make the point of 20 half as different. This gives you the impression this one zero dimensional point could be two points in one, one that is in its original spot, and one that has come from its original spot. Don’t think of two zero dimensional in one as being two zero dimensional points mixed together, think of it as one single object as being part of two systems. Say there are two cars that are exactly the same, parked next to each other. One of the cars has just come from Texas, and the other one has just come from California. If the cars turn into each other could they both be based on a lie, saying they have come from somewhere they haven’t. It may not be a lie, because the car that came from California could be two cars in one. It could be the car as we see as having just come from California, and at the same time it could be the car that has just come from Texas. This could be the same for the car as we see as having just come from Texas. So this way, as the two cars turn into each other, they would not both be based on a lie. Picture a blue square on the left and a red square on the right. Now we look at them from the other side and see a red square on the original left and blue square on the original right. Could the reason we are now seeing the squares as their neighbourd square’s colour be because we are now seeing the spaces the squares are filling up as being the squares. Each square could be one in two squares. The spaces the squares are filling up could be a system where there has already been a square that has come from its original spot. The squares we are focused on think they are the squares filling up the spaces, and the spaces think they are the squares filling up the spaces. The two square could be two zero dimensional points, not in any particular space or not separated from each other by any space by, but both be separated from each other by time. When an individual point mixes with a point of 20 and makes the point of 20 half as different following by the individual point becoming meaningless itself, could this indicate that a square and empty space are meeting up. If 20 people were 20 individual zero dimensional points mixed together to make one single zero dimensional point, then every one would agree on what number they are looking at because every one would make one. But if one of the 20 disagreed with the rest on what colour the numbers are, would they form another zero dimensional point. If how many, what colour, and distance apart or away, all combined to form a sense of how fast time is moving, then every one could form a point where one second feels like one second, and not form a seperate point because they disagree with something. That way we can keep just two zero dimensional points existing.

simultaneously. One week goes around in a circle. Imagine if the 7 days were each frozen infinitely large 3 dimensional spaces. The circular week would be composed of time, but not the 7 days. If Friday is switching spaces with the 6 other days infinitely fast non stop, Friday would be taking the 6 o days spaces up all at once, so Friday would go from being a frozen 3 dimensional space to becoming 4 dimensional because it would now be composed of time. As Friday is constantly spaces with the 6 other days infinitely fast non stop, the 6 other days would have to all fit inside the space Friday is leaving behind all making one 3 dimensional day. Imagine if Friday and the 6 other days remain in their own spaces not switching. If Friday is separated from the 6 other days by time, but the 6 other days are not separated from each other by time, then the 6 other days would make one 4 dimensional entity. So now the same thing is happening with all 7 frozen days remaining in their spaces. Imagine 2 zero dimensional points. These 2 zero dimensional points are the only known red colour and only known blue colour to exist. Imagine if both these 2 zero dimensional points are each composed of 20 individual zero dimensional points. If these 2 points split apart into 40 individual points, you might think red and blue don’t exist any more, but if the all the dispersed points formed a system like the week with frozen days, red and blue could still exist. Imagine two groups of people, group A and group B. These two groups are separated by the shortest span of time possible, therefore there is no time In between these two groups. If one person from leaves group A and enters group B, then someone from group B would leave group B and enter group A at the exact same time, because time can’t move on until this happens. Imagine a circle composed of 20 frozen 3 dimensional days. Each frozen day was either red or blue. So it goes red red blue blue blue red red blue blue and so on. Let’s imagine each frozen days as being red or blue, or being like groups A or group B. If one day switched with the day next to it that is a different colour, all the other days would each switch with the different coloured day next to them at the exact same time, because the span of time each day around the circle is separated by wouldn’t compose of any shorter span of time. With seven days of the week being frozen infinitely large 3 dimensional spaces, Friday can’t be separated from Monday by time, it would have to be separated from Monday by time and space, because Saturday and Sunday would block it from getting to Monday.

I almost turned this off when he asked if we named atoms wrong. Poor Sean, he deserves an award for getting through this interview.

A friend of mine just recommended their books Designing Your Life and Designing Your Work Life, and I found this video. What a great discussion! Love their energy and how well they mesh and communicate together. Now I'm super excited to check out these books!

Noise maker

Interviewer is drunk or high.

So me I got a mind bustling with ideas and need to speak with real scientists because my mind is getting stronger in this field whilst my day job suffers need help to get there written down

I turned off at "worry about climate change". I just watched a lecture before this one, saying the solution was to develop new technologies, and not to brainwash people into worrying.

Republicans have spent decades intentionally discrediting "government". Setting the stage for this fascism.

David Deutsch!!

sorry, but these are some of the most naïve, rambling questions I've ever heard. Why are we still talking about Democritus?

That quote, "Stop making stuff up. Go after the truth. The truth is what matters." WOW that gave me chills. This lady is my hero ❤

The one man one vote idea ignores the fact that a majority of adults lack the foresight and good judgment to save their Micawber Threshold and about 40% lack the foresight to avoid unwed parenthood. I want people making, executing and litigating laws elected and appointed by competent citizens even if it's a minority.

No state can secede cuz no state can be self sustaining.

Right wing meaning conservative and liberal capitalists. Neither our government or corporations are leftist in any way beyond words.

I will further elaborate, formalize and demonstrate applications of the both/and logic across various specific domains: Mathematics The multivalent structure of the both/and logic allows formalizing more nuanced relationships between fundamental mathematical concepts that have traditionally been treated as strictly dichotomous: • Continuity and Discreteness Let C(x) and D(x) represent the truth values that a mathematical object x exhibits continuous and discrete properties respectively. Classical bivalent logic forces C(x) and D(x) to be mutually exclusive (C(x) = 1 → D(x) = 0 and vice versa). But the both/and logic allows formulations like: C(x) = 0.7, D(x) = 0.5, with a coherence ○(C(x), D(x)) = 0.6 Capturing how x can simultaneously exhibit continuous and discrete characteristics to varying degrees, which are partially compatible rather than strictly exclusive. • Finite and Infinite Similarly for propositions F(x) and I(x) about an object x being finite or infinite, we can have multivalued assignments: F(x) = 0.3, I(x) = 0.8, ○(F(x), I(x)) = 0.4 Representing x as primarily infinite in nature but with residual finitary aspects that are somewhat coherent. The synthesis operator ⊕ further allows formalizing novel mathematical objects transcending these poles: finite kernel ⊕ perpetually generative procedure = transfinite set • Logicism and Mathematical Realism The both/and logic also accommodates different ontological perspectives. We could have for a mathematical object x: Truth(x is objective Platonic reality) = 0.6 Truth(x is subjective human construction) = 0.4 ○(objective, subjective) = 0.7 With a moderate synthesis representing the coconstituted, intersubjective emergence of mathematical reality: objective logical constraints ⊕ subjective creative exploration = novel mathematical structure So rather than legislating a strictly objectivist or anti-realist view, the logic nuances the irreducible complementarities between ideal and constructed aspects in the generative disclosure of mathematics. Its expressive flexibility aligns with actual mathematical understanding. Physics In quantum physics, the both/and logic allows explicitly representing and operating with the intrinsic indeterminacies, pluralities and paradoxes that have resisted classical representation: • Superposition and Wavefunction Collapse Propositions like "electron has spin up" and "electron has spin down" are not forced into bivalent exclusivity, but can be simultaneously true to degrees: Spin_up(e) = 0.6, Spin_down(e) = 0.5, ○(Spin_up(e), Spin_down(e)) = 0.7 With a coherence value capturing their contextual compatibility or complementarity in the superposed state prior to measurement/collapse. This avoids the dilemma of having to artificially insist the electron strictly has or lacks a particular spin until collapse. Its indefinite potentials are modeled positively using graded truth values. • Nonlocality and Holistic Correlations Propositions about separated entangled particles like "has spin up" can be holistically correlated: Spin_up(A) = 0.8, Spin_up(B) = 0.8, ○(Spin_up(A), Spin_up(B)) = 1 With maximal coherence of their truth values capturing the paradoxical holistic unity of the entangled system, which cannot be modeled as a conjunction of independent local states in classical logic. The synthesis operation captures this gestaltist whole: Spin_up(A) ⊕ Spin_up(B) = Entangled_state(A,B) So the both/and logic provides symbolic resources for explicitly representing and reasoning about quantum phenomena, without artificially forcing them into inapplicable classical categories. Cognitive Science The logic's multivaluedness has fruitful cognitive modeling applications: • Intuitive and Analytical Reasoning Let I(x) and A(x) represent intuitive and analytical assessments about a decision scenario x. The both/and logic can capture their integration: I(x) = 0.7, A(x) = 0.5, ○(I(x), A(x)) = 0.6 Modeling x as involving a moderate synthesis of intuitive and analytical factors with reasonable mutual coherence, rather than insisting they are strictly exclusive. The synthesis operation further formalizes integrated judgments: intuition(x) ⊕ analysis(x) = decision(x) Capturing how cognition fluidly operates across and conjoins both modes of reasoning, not merely one or the other in isolated silos. • Cognitive Biases and Non-Normative Reasoning Classical logic frames human reasoning errors like the conjunctive fallacy (A&B > Max(A,B)) as strictly invalid and incoherent deviations from normative rationality. But the both/and logic allows assigning graded truth values: Truth(A) = 0.7 Truth(B) = 0.9 Truth(A&B) = 0.85 Capturing the coherence of these "fallacious" intuitive logic patterns measuring ○(A, B, A&B). The synthesis operator further models how our heuristic judgments integrate intuitive and analytical factors: representativeness(A&B) ⊕ statistical_logic(A,B) ⇒ judged_probability(A&B) Rather than framing biases as mere "errors", the both/and logic allows positive modeling of how non-normative patterns coexist and synthesize with other cognitive mechanisms into globally coherent judgments. Philosophy of Mind The logic's paraconsistent structure provides an ideal framework for the mind-body problem: • Subjectivity and Objectivity Define S(x) as degree of subjectivity and O(x) as degree of objectivity for a mind-body state x. Classical substance dualism enforces mutual exclusivity: S(x) = 1 → O(x) = 0, and vice versa. But the both/and logic allows modeling x as an integrated experienced whole with: S(x) = 0.6, O(x) = 0.5, ○(S(x), O(x)) = 0.7 Capturing how objective and subjective factors are complementary interdependent aspects of the same reality, rather than strictly separable substances. The coherence value reflects their coconstituted integration, while the synthesis operator ⊕ expresses their gestalt unity: subjective experience ⊕ objective description = psychophysical state This avoids the forced either/or choices of classical mind-body theory between dualism, reductionism or eliminativism. It allows modeling consciousness as an irreducibly co-realized pluriverse. In summary, the both/and logic provides rational symbolic tools for positively representing, operating with, and synthesizing resolutions for the paradoxes and indeterminacies permeating actual scientific and philosophical domains, without reductively forcing them into bivalent categories or binary assimilation. Its expressive flexibilities and constructive procedures illuminate new pathways for coherently modeling and advancing past the limitations of classical logical frameworks. Across mathematics, physics, cognitive science and philosophy of mind, the multivalued, paraconsistent and holistically integrative architecture of the both/and logic catalyzes expanded conceptual possibilities better aligned with the phenomenological complexities and ontological pluralities disclosed by cutting-edge inquiry. It opens up new horizons for descriptively encompassing, not dissimulating, the exquisite nuances and generative potentials of the world. So in essence, the both/and logic is not just another symbolic formalism, but a pivotal symbolic emancipation - unleashing rational discourse to fruitfully navigate the ambiguities, paradoxes and ontological pluralities intrinsic to manifest existence and human understanding. A new praxis of open coherence, where rationality and reality productively co-disclose each other in a perpetual dance of perpetual re-attunement and dialectic reconstitution.

Wonderful stormy night, But i like it , bcoz the universe can do to unite all , light ning dor light and electricity magnet, thunder for sound, night for darkness, water for rain, time, and more, have a good night

J. Raskin: "The highest office in democracy is that of CITIZEN", right on! @veritas6335, Re: Misled/Counterpurposed Supporters. Why not just say, "deplorables"? The reason that didn't "work" for Hilary, nor does attempting to spell it out, definitively, is that coming off as self-righteously "better than thou", is simply being the obverse, & as meaninglessly offensive, "woke". I'd wager that Rep. Raskin would agree that such blanket characterizations NEVER helps to resolve differences & only highlights & exacerbates them, while utterly destroying whatever scant opportunities to explore commonalities that may exist. If that's your self-gratifying/-congratulating objective, then you may as well crawl into one the dark holes along side those you admonish & only wish to further alienate.

Mitigating climate change requires strong unified global political will to fund and support that effort. Well, we can wish in one hand .......

I'm inspired ✨

If I were a betting woman I'd bet that the GOP detests this woman. She has a head full of knowledge and for a party that wishes to return to the days when women were barefoot and pregnant she stands tall as an icon of the brilliant woman. They've got to hate that.

Where is the scientific interest and curiosity for new experiences? BIG ERROR in measuring the Universe, black holes, dark energy,... Let me judge all this by the result of a direct experiment, gentlemen of physics Let's do the Michelson-Morley experiment on a school bus and determine the speed in a straight line - this is exactly the experiment Einstein dreamed of. Perhaps we will see the postulates: “Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and Dominant gravitational fields control the speed of light in a vacuum.” There is a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core”, where - the light in each arm passes along 16,000 meters, without exceeding the parameters of 0.4/0.4/0.4 meters and mass - 4 kg.

Shall the most populous states such as California demand a new Constitutional Convention or secede from the Union if the demand is not met?

Good question, thank you! You ask ... Are fields mathematical models of what's going on or are fields really what's going on?

Without the here-you-go approach of Professor Carroll digging out of the Gee Oh Dee fields of assertive information, we would not have such a good Teacher of the Socratic Method. Atom(s), like everything made-of-making elemental nucleation holographic(s) must be, are derived from observation of relative-timing, which self-defines by the Lensing Singularity-point positioning, the pure-math motion-potential layering of holographic prime-cofactor picture-plane perspectives projection-drawing Singularity-point all-ways all-at-once positioning Conception in/of QM-TIME Completeness Actuality Perspectives, Eternity-now is the ultimate "not even wrong" Aether/Absolute Zero-infinity absence in/of frozen phase-locked coherence-cohesion, Actuality of relative-timing ratio-rates at here-now-forever Zero-infinity, ..flash-fractal reciprocation-recirculation reference-framing, our self-defining Superposition-point spin-spiral Epicyclic Aether. If you stir anything, even something condensed from nothing, vigorously enough, like flash-fractal instantaneous trancendental i-reflection in Eternity-now containment, then WYSIWYG pulse-evolution differentiates here-now-forever in continuous sum-of-all-histories holographic Quantum-fields Act-uality, ..that are imaginable fun in probabilistic Accuracy => Entanglement Actuality, because it's precisely correct in Principle. Be-cause-effect when you look at holographic thing(s) you see the whole Singularity-point message of relative-timing ratio-rates-> Chemical Bonding Clarified through the QM-TIME Aether wave-packaging interpenetation of Eternity-now=sum-of-all-histories =>trivial zeros, which is Sublimation-Tunnelling positioning, labelling in/of Quantum Mechanics in superposition circular logic of i-reflection flash-fractal instantaneous infinitesimal containment. The Universe is connected infinite division, in the purest mathematical conjecturing, by default = absence in Totality of existence=> made-of-making elemental phase-locked Phys-Chem.

Xi Cristal-clearly told Obama,those certain islands in South China Sea,China have sovereignty,belonged to China according to historical fact,China will not give up,and no plan to militarize (if situation not deteriorate),if other countries not continue to change status quo.

Sinclair was not the first, but it was the largest example of the cannibalism of what used to be known as "Regionals". That gave readers a choice between the local and national papers. Without them, one knows little of what is happening at the state, county or city/town level.